This article is the second part of a series of articles “Where will things be in a decade? Toronto’s Transit Engoodening“. Check out the previous parts in this series if you haven’t yet!

On the other end of the rail spectrum, there are a number of light rail lines at various stages of development which, while (as I often discuss) are unlikely to be groundbreaking in terms of speed improvements, will provide a more regular, consistent, and attractive local transit service on key corridors.

The Toronto region is adding 4 new surface light rail corridors, and expanding existing light rail as well.

An Eglinton Crosstown LRV.

Finch and Eglinton East

Line 6 Finch and the eastern half of Line 5 Eglinton will add two new rail services similar to the 512 St. Clair streetcar, which will replace two very busy suburban bus routes between Line 1 and Humber College, and Yonge & Eglinton and Kennedy Station through the Golden Mile. This will mean more capacity, less emissions, more attractive (but still not sufficient) streetscapes, and the capacity to reallocate road space on these corridors, which will certainly make them feel a cut above where they are today.

And, for what it’s worth, they will be a cut above the St. Clair streetcar, with faster service, larger trains, level boarding, and off-board fare payment. Essentially, the are not revolutionary, but evolutionary — and that’s not nothing.

What’s more, their interchanges with rapid transit and Humber College will all happen in new or expanded underground stations, which will strengthen those nodes and make those connections more attractive.

Hurontario

The Hurontario tram route, which will be known as Line 10 (for Highway 10 – Hurontario’s former designation), will add a service that is similar to Line 6 to the main north-south corridor of Mississauga and Brampton. My personal view is that with the enormous development on the corridor and future growth potential in Peel, this line really should have been SkyTrain. But no matter what, at the end of the day, it will likely drive more ridership and development than the current bus service, while also providing more comfortable and consistent transit service. Hurontario should also be quickly than the lines in Toronto thanks to the longer gaps between stations, which will help it gain more riders than it would have otherwise, and create a bit of a backbone that other services in the region can connect into. Perhaps it will also convince residents to push for more similar service in the future.

Hurontario is also a first in a few ways. It’s the first numbered transit route in the GTHA that is entirely outside of Toronto, and the first electric transit line outside of Toronto to directly interface with a frequent, all-day GO line (the Lakeshore West at Port Credit) — ION in Waterloo region requires an annoying walk (until the new “transit hub” at King and Victoria is completed), and the Hamilton LRT will not connect directly with either of that city’s GO stations.

Hamilton

Hamilton’s tram route is in procurement at the moment and will be the most modest of Ontario’s modern light rail lines. That being said, it will be the spark for the beginning of what can likely be a much larger system and a lot of urban regeneration. While the line won’t connect directly to GO train services, it will be a short walk away, and it will connect to major destinations in Hamilton, such as downtown, McMaster University, and Tim Hortons Field.

TTC Streetcar

Streetcars on St Clair.

There is also likely to be some modest expansion to the streetcar network. I can’t imagine the Waterfront East LRT through the Port Lands won’t be built — and that will connect the aforementioned district as well as eventually East Harbour station and the streetcar corridors on Broadview, as well as hopefully the Leslie Barns maintenance facility.

I also would expect to see a new connection on Dufferin created between the Harbourfront streetcar route and the King Streetcar, allowing for the “Waterfront West LRT” or a through-running waterfront to western Queens streetcar service to eventually run.

Of course, I am less excited about TTC streetcar expansion than the new tram routes — and that’s mostly because service on the streetcars is often not very good, and because the TTC treats them like buses. If that were to change, things would be very exciting!


The next topic to cover is subways — make sure to subscribe to have it delivered to your inbox as soon as it’s available!

12 responses to “Toronto’s Transit Engoodening — Part 2: Light Rail”

  1. Hi Reece, I wonder what are your thoughts on Metrolinx in general? With so many projects going on, as well as already obvious systemic issues within agency (Line 5 seems to have hit every possible hurdle), do you think they’ll be able to learn on their mistakes, grow internal expertise, and actually pull off all of the LRT projects? How optimistic/pessimistic are you about them, and their level of competence?

    1. I think Metrolinx has many problems, not being very transparent being a key one. I actually think a lot of the issues with Line 5 are shared with the city / TTC since the Crosstown was their project, and a lot of the poor decisions on it were made by them.

      They do seem to be learning, and growing a small amount of internal expertise, but the issue is they don’t seem interested in developing *serious* internal capability. That being said, the projects *they* have fully led like Finch / Hurontario / Ontario Line do seem to be going better than Eglinton, and to their credit Metrolinx is way more progressive than most agencies in the US – GO service is generally very good and has been expanded a lot, and Presto has also got to a point where it is good. I also think generally speaking the Metrolinx wayfinding stuff is leaps and bounds better than TTC.

      The most concerning thing for me is that along with TTC before them Metrolinx seems to be disregarding keeping / building expertise and costs for projects are exploding, on a lot of other stuff they are *alright*.

  2. What is predicted weekday ridership on the new LR lines?

    1. Combined? Probably >200,000 after a decade or two.

  3. @reecemartintransit what is the legacy network missing? A little bit of TSP? More road space? longer tunnel sections?

    1. TSP yes, better road / track design, more space, modern wayfinding, modern stops, modern stop spacing, modernized operations, longer tunnels!

  4. Honestly I wished with the Hamilton LRT ideas they implemented both for A & B Lines. Nice small network, connects to two GO stations & the airport, universities etc. Could possibly divert some domestic flights to Hamilton if the rail connection and service is sufficient enough for that region.

    1. You know what, I mostly agree! Especially the short spur to West Harbour

  5. @reecemartintransit Looks promising, any increase in the span of the network is a good step in the right direction.

    1. It is a good step, whether it is the *best* step is another question!

  6. Dimitri Zafeiropoulos Avatar
    Dimitri Zafeiropoulos

    Has Ontario/ Metrolinx made public the plan to expand and extend the Hazel Mccallion/ line 10. I know they said they plan to extend it to Brampton GO and add the downtown loop but what will that look like?

  7. I agree with your stance on the streetcars – on one hand, Toronto has an extensive amount of infrastructure for the system, but it also continues to ignore its potential and justify its operation with ‘its cheaper than buses’. The bigger loss of money here is the potential ridership and economic gains that could come with a more competent network built with the same features as seen on Finch or Hurontario, with pedestrianization ideas taken from some European cities.

Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from Reece Martin

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading