A video yesterday from Oh The Urbanity! got me thinking about cities in the Canadian province of Alberta (famed for its oil). In many ways Albertan cities are outperforming those in the rest of Canada, and the US – from getting housing built, to population growth, but I think that the big thing cities in Alberta need to work on is their infrastructure – and in particular transportation infrastructure. I’ve been planning a bunch of videos on different transport topics in the province, but I wanted to write this short blog post to get some of my thoughts out now.


If you enjoy my content, consider subscribing to my blog:

or supporting me on Patreon:

Your support will help me bring you more content faster!


Sprawl and Buses

While Calgary and Edmonton are growing and densifying (I think Calgary’s downtown in particular is widely and severely underrated), they are also growing out with sprawl. And far too often, this sprawl isn’t even very well served by transit.

EDMONTON, CANADA – JANUARY 28, 2024:
A sunset view of Edmonton downtown from Griesbach Central Park, on January 28, 2024, in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

I will get to talking about rail, but Albertan cities have unusually comprehensive highway and semi-highway road networks for Canada, and meanwhile they mostly lack the high-quality suburban and express buses (not to mention suburban rail) of Toronto, Vancouver, or Montreal. Calgary doesn’t even a night bus network or a IC card payment system, and even more frustrating, the city spent a bunch of money on nice bus shelters and on creating a “BRT-lite” network and then went and ran the routes every 20+ minutes.

A Calgary Transit MAX bus. (St Clair Witch, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons)

Cities in Alberta would benefit enormously from complete overhauls of how they do buses (Edmonton is better than Calgary), and even just matching the bus network of Vancouver (in terms of quality) would be huge — especially if it came with bus lanes and busways, which the Albertan cities have loads of room for. Essentially, there’s a lot of basic stuff that cities in Alberta need to get on with if they want transit that matches that in other Canadian cities, much less the best cities in the world (which I think we should strive for!)

Trains

And then there are the rail networks. Both Calgary and Edmonton in my view began developing their rail networks in very smart ways off of the German Stadtbahn model. However, the networks both have single trunk sections and too few branches — if you look at the Stuttgart Stadtbahn for example:

Stuttgart’s Stadtbahn network. (Maximilian Dörrbecker (Chumwa), CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0, via Wikimedia Commons)

you’ll see a much denser network with several city centre trunks, numerous suburban branches, and interconnections between branches outside of the city centre — all served by a wide range of services.

A city like Calgary or Edmonton could have this, it would just need to be cost effective, keep building, and learn where to spend money (city centre tunnels and grade separations) and where to cut costs (single-tracking and suburban train-like corridors outside of core areas). As it turns out, both Calgary and Edmonton have actually managed to do a lot of incremental cost-effective expansion historically (and Edmonton might? still be doing so), but over the last decade Calgary has built essentially nothing, and Edmonton has built some rather mixed projects (the Metro line for example completely ignores the learnings from German cities with regard to speed and grade separation). Both cities are also all-in on P3s for their big new lines, which will probably lead to high costs and further slowing of transit expansion.

[some calgary/edmonton rail]

The newest lines in both Edmonton and Calgary — the cross-city Valley and Green lines respectively — also make the mistake of moving to a new standard for rail vehicles (low-floor trams), which are more expensive to maintain, lower capacity, and nigh impossible to mesh with the existing high-floor systems into a Stuttgart-style integrated network. And probably most importantly, I think that the networks are just too small (these new cross-city lines should have been completed in the early 2000s). While Ottawa will not have a network as big as Calgary or Edmonton when the second phase of the O-Train is complete (and the system obviously has its well known reliability problems) the truth is Ottawa will have a fairly comprehensive metro-style system that is almost as big as Edmonton and Calgary’s Stadtbahn/tram systems.

Planes and, Well, More Trains

And importantly, Ottawa’s network will actually connect to its airport — it amazes me that “business-friendly” Calgary has not built an extension of the Blue line to the airport (this is the correct solution — please NO APMs), which should be a cheap ~6 kilometer extension. It’s doubly crazy because these days Calgary airport is moving nearly 20 million passengers per year.

Edmonton should be ashamed too because it’s airport only has a single ETS bus, and it runs only half hourly! It also needs to be said that the lack of an Edmonton-Calgary train is crazy, especially because even just at the 200kph speeds that Brightline hits on the expressway-side leg to Orlando, a train journey between the cities would smoke the car. And this is before we get into talking about the other mainline rail projects the province should be looking at!

What Alberta could look like…

All of this leads me to what things could be. And to learn more about that, you’ll have to stay tuned for my “Crayoning with Reece” for Edmonton and Calgary.

In the meantime:

17 responses to “Cities in Alberta have huge potential, but they need to work on transportation.”

  1. As a former Calgarian… I can agree there’s a LOT of potential. But, there doesn’t seem to be a critical mass of people who actually want to prioritize this kind of development. The attitude toward transit in general seems much more… begrudging than it seems to be in Toronto. As a very, very suburban-minded city, any transit development is a hard sell. Every new community slapped at the edge of the city needs its hundred million dollar interchanges built post-haste, and any transit more than a token low frequency bus route may come in a few decades. I also just encountered way too many people who saw taking the train as being “for the poors”. As a result of all this, the can is always the first to get kicked further down the stroad.

    Hometown bitterness aside – I’d love to see what you come up with. There are so many easy wins in Alberta.

    1. The sprawl is a real issue, but at least the city has good bones! Stay tuned!

  2. The green line should have gone south through Mission and intersected with the Red line at 39th Ave, before rejoining the currently planned corridor before Ogden. The current alignment through Inglewood is better suited for an eastern line out to Forest Lawn and Chestermere, meanwhile a lot of existing density in Mission and the Beltline (incl. 17th Ave) goes underserved. And of course it should have been high floor. Not only this, but no thought has been put into where the system might integrate into a mainline rail hub in the downtown. The green line is just really poorly thought out.

    1. I think the most astonishing thing is that heavy construction STILL hasn’t started!

  3. As an Edmontonian who used to live in Vancouver, I don’t disagree with a single thing. Both the Metro and Valley Line suffer from the same problems. There’s this push for so-called “urban LRT” that puts trains into the environment without creating separation from everything else. I feel this is driven by car-centric thinking, as drivers complain about the Capital Line on 111 Street and its impact on traffic light times, while the Valley Line basically follows traffic lights, and is more likely to stop at them than the Capital/Metro Line.

    When it comes to buses, there’s a lot of low-hanging fruit. The 747 aside (which could have far greater frequency), bus routes in the city seem to be lacking. The 701, an in-neighbourhood route that goes from Southgate to Kingsway via downtown and connects one of the city’s biggest high schools has a pretty lame 30 minute frequency. South Edmonton Common, as large and sprawling as it is, only has one circular bus route from Mill Woods, which is further away than Century Park, and even that suffers from low frequency, making using it to navigate the sprawl on foot impractical.
    In the outer suburbs, there is room for a crosstown service linking the various neighbourhoods along Ellerslie Road in the south, yet it doesn’t exist. To travel from Windermere in the southwest to Walker in the southeast, you have to go into the city and then take two transfers to go back out, wasting a lot of time. And for the crosstown services that do exist, they often don’t have an express service accompanying them like Vancouver does with RapidBus. A ride from Mill Woods to West Edmonton Mall on the 56 takes an hour and a half because it stops everywhere along the way.

    The issue I see here is that I feel there’s not enough funding to build infrastructure in Edmonton in general. We haven’t had a new hospital since 1988, we’re still short on schools, libraries, recreation centres, and the other amenities typical to a city. Snow clearing in a lot of the newer neighbourhoods is subpar.

    Ideally I’d like to see bus frequency in Edmonton’s suburbs go up to at least every 15 minutes all day like Toronto does, more crosstown and express routes, and, like you said, a better LRT network that covers more parts of the city.

    Unfortunately, even doing a part of this is gonna take a lot of work and a lot of investment from the province, which they honestly don’t seem too interested in, unlike Ontario.

    PS: about HSR between Edmonton and Calgary, this is a very desired thing, but there are people here who think it’s too expensive and wouldn’t have enough ridership to justify it, or the fares would be too high for people to want to use it. If you’re making a video on Alberta, it’d be great if you could address this.

    1. I honestly am not sure truly high speed rail makes sense in Alberta, it might be a place where building 200kph is fine honestly. I would reserve the ROW long term for HSR though!

      Totally agree about the bus service, just not good enough.

  4. What would your opinion be on a Terminus station by Government Centre Station connecting to both Metro & Capital lines, near downtown, on the High Level Streetcar ROW?

    Though the bridge would probably need to get replaced due to age and probably wouldn’t handle any mainline trains anymore, guessing it wasn’t used for the LRT. Would be for a hypothetical Intercity, Commuter or High Speed Rail to and from Edmonton. Doesn’t seem to have much good transit connections on the former CP station by Gateway Blvd let alone being a one way multi lane stroad.

  5. Would an LRT spur to YYR really be better than an APM though? Wouldn’t that cut LRT frequencies to Saddletowne?

  6. I understand the fear of an APM. But there is no reason that something frequent, properly connected, and fare integrated (ideally, nominally free) can’t be part of any transit system’s airport connections. Is a one seat ride preferable, sure, but a very short step from main line to airport will not put anybody sane off.

  7. One of the reasons for the low floor green line design is that it is planned to run straight up the middle of Centre Street from downtown to the north. It will make use of an existing four-lane Street and there is no desire to expropriate houses on either side. You wouldn’t be able to put a regular LRT system into this space.

    Yes, it’s taking too long to get going with construction on this green line. We’re only now beginning to start on the southeastern leg of it. And the northern leg is still not funded. Why the delay? Calgary suffers from having a council with a majority of counsellors in sprawl type suburbs. All they want is more funding for expensive, overpasses and freeway extensions, and have little interest in the greater good that is offered by transit. On top of that, they keep voting to expand the city limits and build, yet more sprawling suburbs That cannot be serviced for what they’re charging developers. So each new suburb puts the city further into the hall. Where does the money come from? Chopping transit, of course.

  8. When will you finish your crayoning video for Alberta?

  9. Abdullah Rizwan Avatar
    Abdullah Rizwan

    Which City do you think has, overall, better transportation, Calgary or Edmonton?

  10. Abdullah Rizwan Avatar
    Abdullah Rizwan

    I also watched the Oh the Urbanity! video recently and was very impressed by the progress of Edmonton on housing. Transit, not so much…

  11. Abdullah Rizwan Avatar
    Abdullah Rizwan

    I remember when the Valley Line southeast opened, the frequencies were very poor. The city said that this was a temporary measure to get to iron out an issues and that they will increase frequencies later, has that happened?

  12. One specific thing Calgary Transit can and should do is extend the northern terminus of route 20 to the Airport. It would then provide a one-seat service to both U of C and MRU, as well as connect major activity centres including both the Foothills and Rockyview hospitals and McMahon Stadium, and Heritage Park.

    1. Sure, That could be an option. But I wonder what the ridership would be like. How hard is it really to get off the BRT service that Runs Down Center, Street from the airport, and simply transfer onto a 20?

  13. […] few weeks after I wrote an article about Calgary and Edmonton’s need to improve their transportation. I was thinking about this […]

Leave a Reply to SolomonCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Reece Martin

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading