Canadian cities have a big problem — well, actually, they have several. Ridership recovery from COVID has not been completed, transit systems are starved for funds, and congestion is very severe.

Congestion pricing is the talk of the town since the New York Governor decided that the “bold” idea that she campaigned on not long ago was actually a bad idea that should be stopped, but not before the clocks ticked down and the MTA spent loads of money on the infrastructure to institute it. If anything is a bad idea, it would be ever electing Kathy Hochul again.

I was really hoping congestion pricing would happen in New York, because it would set a precedent for North America and get the attention of people across the continent and probably the world. If even New York has managed to get this done, then it’s probably a good idea!

My video on the topic

Unfortunately, but perhaps unsurprisingly given its recent history of trendsetting delays and cost blowouts, New York will not lead on this, or at least it’s looking unlikely it will (advocates are trying hard, but a second reversal seems even more unlikely). But, despite what is happening in New York, Canadian cities should get on with congestion pricing — and the case is very strong!


If you enjoy my content, consider subscribing to my blog:

or supporting me on Patreon:

Your support will help me bring you more content faster!


Congestion

Canadian cities have very dense and congested city centres, often with kind of lackluster transit because traffic and road obstructions. Toronto’s downtown has been absolutely slammed with traffic due to the closure of the Gardiner Expressway for its reconstruction and various other big infrastructure projects (the media in Toronto has naturally had a field day with endless hyperbolic pieces about the crisis where they fail to mention that many people could just take the subway or GO train).

Traffic in Downtown Toronto.

But I think what’s clear is that with massively increasing densities that are sometimes similar to those seen in Manhattan, something is going to have to give. We can’t just hope people won’t drive, because old illogical habits die hard, and in the meantime the streets are jammed, transit, commerce and essential vehicles can’t move and the city is being choked with emissions. This is just the reality of making it far too easy for people to drive without a second thought.

Alternatives

Fortunately, alternatives are coming fast and furious. Montreal is getting new REM service, Toronto is getting the Ontario Line, and Vancouver is getting the Broadway Subway. Getting into city centres on transit is already straightforward, and these new rail lines will make it great.

Of course, there is no reason we couldn’t start implementing charges now — people have transit options today.

The Montreal REM.

Once a charge is implemented, cities can also move fast to implement new bike and bus lanes — something they have already been doing, but which would get a huge boost from freed up road space and extra demand from people logically ditching their cars.

I will likely follow this piece up with city-specific congestion pricing ideas for Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver, so stay tuned!

9 responses to “Canadian Cities Should Do Congestion Pricing”

  1. rogersexton140 Avatar
    rogersexton140

    I look forward Reece to read your proposals for Canadian cities. However, in the light of recent experience (especially here in Britain) any English-SPEAKING politician who proposes congestion charging is going to lose their seat/post at the next election. The motoring lobby is strong and well-organised in English-speaking countries.
    As you probably know, Britain is going to the polls in three weeks time. The one thing which might stiil save the Conservatives is if they took a pro-motorist stance, ;’No Congestion Charging, No Clean Air Zones’. (A CAZ is seen by most British people, rightly or wrongly, as a form of congestion charge.)

    1. I agree its a real problem, but I don’t want to feed into the notion that it should / is unpopular more than it is!

      1. rogersexton140 Avatar
        rogersexton140

        It is very significant that the Labour party in its manifesto for 4th July British election has not said anything about congestion charging or Clean Air Zones. It is does not want to frighten the (many) British voters who run a car because they feel that public transport is inadequate and/or overpriced.
        It has (as expected) promised to bring the railways back under public control, and to make it much easier for Local Authorities to control bus services through franchising. Both these policies ARE popular. The usually Conservative supporting ‘Times’ newspaper described the bus proposal as a ‘no-brainer’. (Ie it is does not requiire any thought to realise that this is a GOOD proposal.)

  2. @reecemartintransit I'm a bit surprised that noone has quoted the song "New York, New York" yet.If congestion pricing can make it there, it can make it everywhere.

    1. I am surprised too haha, unfortunately it couldn’t make it there!

  3. Congestion pricing would be great in Canada’s largest cities! It would make a lot of sense in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, which all have dense downtowns that are well served by transit and often have bad traffic congestion. It might also make sense in Ottawa, Calgary and Edmonton. Having fewer cars and less pollution in Canadian cities’ downtowns would be great for their economies and for people’s health, and the money from the tolls could be invested in improving public transit and active transportation infrastructure.

    That said, it would probably be politically difficult to implement congestion pricing in Canadian cities as people would certainly make arguments against it that would be similar to the arguments against congestion pricing heard in the greater NYC area (like about how it would supposedly be unjust for people who live in transit deserts, damaging to small businesses that rely on deliveries, unfair for people who have no choice but to drive, etc.). Also, the fact that very few roads are currently tolled in Canada means that unlike in the US, most drivers in Canada aren’t used to paying tolls, which would possibly contribute to people’s opposition to congestion pricing as people are used to roads being free. Of course, supporters of congestion pricing in New York have done an excellent job explaining why the arguments against congestion pricing don’t make sense in NYC, and they also wouldn’t make sense in Canada’s largest cities where most people already don’t drive to get downtown. Many of the people who currently drive in the downtowns of Canada’s largest cities don’t actually need to drive and could be convinced to switch to public transit or active transportation if driving into downtown weren’t free, and the people who really do need to drive as well as businesses that rely on deliveries by truck would benefit from having less congestion (and like in NYC, there could be discounts for low-income drivers, exemptions for people with disabilities and emergency vehicles, and cheaper tolls at off-peak hours).

    Hopefully, NYC will end up going ahead with congestion pricing. There still seems to be hope that NYC congestion pricing will happen as there doesn’t seem to be a viable alternative to congestion pricing to fund the MTA’s capital program and because there is a New York State law (that the governor of New York can’t just unilaterally overturn) that says that the MTA shall implement congestion pricing. Once congestion pricing is implemented in New York, people in Canadian cities as well as in other US cities will hopefully see how great congestion pricing is and they might be able to influence their local politicians to imitate NYC and implement their own congestion pricing programs.

    1. This is a great summary of the situation, I hope New York moves ahead, but in any case, Canadian cities should.

  4. Are you just another in a long long line of developer shills and bought and paid for so called planners, or just a Laurentian loving supremist? Honestly congestion pricing is the most regressive “solution” anyone can even conjure up. All of this is in aid of more dysfunctional densification – aiding and abetting humougous profits for a select few at the cost of most. There are very very good solutions to the nightmare that is inflicting Toronto and they do not have to be creation of an ever more expensive more exclusive more exclusionary dystopian nightmare. This all from a still dedicated capitalist, who has seen the belly of the beast.

    1. I am not sure if you expect this comment to get a serious response.

      Driving is something which has clear and highly available alternatives, including paying a modest toll to drive on safe well maintained streets. Your hyperbole is needless.

Leave a Reply to john hartleyCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Reece Martin

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading